...................................................................................................................................................................
Photosynthesis
.
Creationists
see photosynthesis as a very sophisticated biochemical process, unable to
evolve by chance and time - one kind of photosynthesis did not evolve into the
other. As long as evolutionists insist the formidable and elegant process of
turning light energy into sugar simply evolved, they will forever “need a
rethink” and will constantly turn over traditional ideas
BY FRANK
SHERWIN, M.A.
Unique
structures in rare bacteria suggest the amazing process of photosynthesis is
much “older” than evolutionists assumed.
There
are two types.
The
first is anoxygenic photosynthesis that uses molecules other than water to
drive the process and doesn’t produce oxygen as a byproduct.
The
second is oxygenic photosynthesis, which separates water into hydrogen and
oxygen to drive photosynthesis, and releases oxygen as a byproduct.
Oxygenic
photosynthesis is the most common, found in algae, plants and some bacteria — a
fundamental process that sustains human and animal life.
For
decades, evolutionary theory stated that anoxygenic photosynthesis evolved
first, followed about a billion years later by oxygenic photosynthesis.
However,
Dr. Tanai Cardona and fellow researchers at Imperial College, London found
unique structures in so-called “ancient” bacteria (Heliobacterium
modesticaldum) indicating that oxygenic photosynthesis was occurring a billion
years earlier than commonly thought.
Creationists see photosynthesis as a very
sophisticated biochemical process, unable to evolve by chance and time.
The
ScienceDaily article stated, “The finding could mean the evolution of
photosynthesis needs a rethink, turning traditional ideas on their head.”
This is true — especially considering that just months
earlier Tanai Cardona lamented, [There is] an incessant stream of speculative ideas
and debates on the evolution of photosynthesis that started in the first half
of the twentieth century and shows no signs of abating.
Some of these speculative ideas have become
commonplace, are taken as fact, but find little support.
By investigating H. modesticaldum, the research team
at Imperial College found fully functional photosynthesis was already in place —
to put it simply: one kind of photosynthesis did not evolve into the other.
As long as evolutionists insist the formidable and
elegant process of turning light energy into sugar simply evolved, they will
forever “need a rethink” and will constantly turn over traditional ideas.
*Mr. Sherwin is Research Associate is at ICR and earned
a master’s in zoology from the University of Northern Colorado.
The Institute for Creation
Research (ICR) wants people to know that God’s Word can be trusted in
everything it speaks about—from how and why we were made, to how the universe
was formed, to how we can know God and receive all He has planned for us.
After 50 years of ministry,
ICR remains a leader in scientific research within the context of biblical
creation. Founded by Dr. Henry Morris in 1970, ICR exists to conduct scientific
research within the realms of origins and Earth history, and then to educate the
public both formally and informally through professional training programs,
through conferences and seminars around the country, and through books,
magazines, and media presentations.
No comments:
Post a Comment