Showing posts with label Reformation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reformation. Show all posts

Sunday, October 11, 2020

THE MILLENNIUM - “Thy Kingdom Come” - Every Christmas we are reminded that Gabriel promised Mary that her son was destined to sit on the Throne of David (which did not exist during the days of His ministry). It is yet to be fulfilled. Jesus taught us to pray specifically for it: "Thy Kingdom come..." A literal rule of Christ on the Throne of David on the Planet Earth - the thousand-year reign, from which the Millennium takes its label, is detailed in numerous passages including Revelation 20, Isaiah 65, and Ezekiel 40-48, among others. It is not heaven - neither is it the "new earth." Death in the Millennium will be for unbelievers only. It is tragic that most of the major denominations - Roman Catholic and Protestant - embrace an eschatology ("study of last things") that is amillennial : a view that does not envision a literal rule of Christ on the Throne of David on the Planet Earth. While there are many different, yet defendable, views regarding many aspects of end-time prophecies, this basic divergence - denying a literal Millennium - is particularly dangerous in that it would appear to be an attack on the very character of God! It does violence to His numerous and explicit promises and commitments that pervade both the Old and New Testaments. The Old Testament is replete with commitments for a literal Messiah ultimately ruling the world through Israel from His throne in Jerusalem. The ancient rabbinical aspirations were dominated by it. In fact, this obsession obscured their recognizing the Messiah when He made His initial appearance. The early church looked longingly for His promised return as their "Blessed Hope" to rid their desperate world of its evil rulers.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

The Millennium

 “Thy Kingdom Come”,

.

Every Christmas we are reminded that Gabriel promised Mary that her son was destined to sit on the Throne of David (which did not exist during the days of His ministry). It is yet to be fulfilled. Jesus taught us to pray specifically for it: "Thy Kingdom come..." A literal rule of Christ on the Throne of David on the Planet Earth - the thousand-year reign, from which the Millennium takes its label, is detailed in numerous passages including Revelation 20, Isaiah 65, and Ezekiel 40-48, among others. It is not heaven - neither is it the "new earth." Death in the Millennium will be for unbelievers only.

by Chuck Missler

 

It is tragic that most of the major denominations - Roman Catholic and Protestant - embrace an eschatology ("study of last things") that is amillennial : a view that does not envision a literal rule of Christ on the Throne of David on the Planet Earth.

While there are many different, yet defendable, views regarding many aspects of end-time prophecies, this basic divergence - denying a literal Millennium - is particularly dangerous in that it would appear to be an attack on the very character of God!

It does violence to His numerous and explicit promises and commitments that pervade both the Old and New Testaments.

The Old Testament is replete with commitments for a literal Messiah ultimately ruling the world through Israel from His throne in Jerusalem.

There are at least 1,845 references in the Old Testament and 17 books give prominence to the event.

The ancient rabbinical aspirations were dominated by it.

In fact, this obsession obscured their recognizing the Messiah when He made His initial appearance.

There are at least 318 references in 216 chapters of the New Testament and 23 of its 27 books give prominence to the event.

The early church looked longingly for His promised return as their "Blessed Hope" to rid their desperate world of its evil rulers.

How and where did this skepticism known as "Amillennialism" begin?

Origen

Pious, popular, and persuasive, Origen stands out as one of the great figures of the 3rd century church. Even at the age of 18, he stood out spectacularly well as a teacher in Alexandria.

(In misguided obedience to Matthew 19:12, he emasculated himself, which he later regretted.)

Later, as a prolific writer based in Caesarea, his De Principiis systematically laid out Christian doctrine in terms of Hellenic thinking and set the pattern for most subsequent theological thought for many years.

His numerous sermons and commentaries, however, tragically also established an extreme pattern of allegorizing Scripture, which was to strongly influence Augustine in subsequent years.

Augustine

Augustine, the Bishop of Hippo (A.D. 354-430), was one of the most influential leaders of the Western church, living during the turbulent days of the disintegration of the Roman Empire.

He lived a sensuous, dissolute life, but following a dramatic conversion he experienced a total change of character.

In 391 he was ordained as a priest in North Africa and four years later was elevated to the Bishop of Hippo.

He embarked on a writing career and his extensive doctrinal writings deeply affected the Medieval Roman Catholic Church.

Augustine's most elaborate writing, The City of God, was written as the Empire lay crumbling under a siege by half-civilized tribes.

It portrayed the Church as a new civic order in the midst of the ruins of the Roman Empire.

Augustine died while the Vandals were besieging the very gates of Hippo in A.D. 430.

Although his writings effectively defeated a number of heresies emerging in those turbulent times, the allegorizing influences of Origen left an amillennial eschatology in their wake.

As the Church had increasingly become an instrument of the state, it wasn't politically expedient to look toward a literal return of Christ to rid the world of its evil rulers!

The allegorical reposturing of those passages was more "politically correct." (This reminds me of the saying among the data processing profession: "If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything!")

The Reformation Shortfall

A thousand years later, under the influences of Martin Luther and others, the Reformation brought an intensive return to the authority of the Scriptures which, in turn, resulted in the subsequent reform in soteriology (the study of salvation) with its emphasis on salvation by faith alone.

Many were willingly burned at the stake for their commitment to a Biblical perspective.

However, one of the unfortunate shortcomings of the Reformation was that it failed to also reexamine the eschatology of the Medieval Church in the light of Scripture.

Thus, the allegorizing alchemy of Origen, institutionalized by Augustine, left a denial of the Millennium that still continues to pervade the doctrines of most Protestant denominations today.

From Augustine to Auschwitz

One of the derivative aspects of an amillennial perspective is that it denies Israel's future role in God's plans.

This also leads to a "replacement theology" in which the Church is viewed as replacing Israel in God's program for mankind.

In addition to forcing an allegorization of many key passages of Scripture, this also led to the tragedy of the Holocaust in Europe.

The responsibility for the six million Jews who were systematically murdered in the concentration camps has to include the silent pulpits who had embraced this heretical eschatology and its attendant anti-Semitism.

Reality of the Millennium

For anyone who takes the Bible seriously, the numerous explicit commitments of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that the Messiah would literally rule from Zion cannot be ignored or explained away.

God's explicit and unconditional commitment of the land of Israel to the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is the very issue that is being challenged by the world today!

And, the resurgence of amillennialism, and its attendant doctrines, are again setting the stage for the next holocaust.

In the New Testament, these commitments are reconfirmed.

Every Christmas we are reminded that Gabriel promised Mary that her son was destined to sit on the Throne of David (which did not exist during the days of His ministry).

It is yet to be fulfilled.

In fact, He taught us to pray specifically for it: "Thy Kingdom come...."

What does that mean?

The thousand-year reign, from which the Millennium takes its label, is detailed in numerous passages including Revelation 20, Isaiah 65, and Ezekiel 40-48, among others.

Ezekiel's detailed tour of the Millennial Temple virtually defies any skeptic's attempt to treat it allegorically (see diagram).

Encompassing a Temple area 50 miles on a side, substantially to the north of Jerusalem, as a source of a river that flows toward both the Mediterranean to the west and the Dead Sea to the east, Ezekiel's description implies a total change of topography, which is explicit in the Scripture.

However, the more we learn about the Millennium, the more questions it raises.

It is not heaven: it is clearly distinctive in contrast to the eternal state which follows (Revelation 21).

It will be characterized by a limited amount of evil, which Christ will judge perfectly and immediately. 

Neither is it the "new earth" that God will yet create; for therein righteousness dwells, which is something not true of the Millennium.

Millennium Paradoxes

As an example of some of the ostensible paradoxes of the Millennium is the strange question of death.

Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum, a dear friend and highly respected Messianic scholar, suggests that death in the Millennium will be for unbelievers only.

Nowhere in the Bible does it speak of a resurrection of Millennial saints. This may be why the resurrection of the tribulation saints is said to complete the "first resurrection" (Revelation 20:4-6).

From the New Covenant in Jeremiah 31:31-34, it would seem that there will be no Jewish unbelievers in the kingdom; all Jews born during the Millennium will accept the Messiah before their 100th year.

Unbelief would thus be among the Gentiles only, and therefore, death would exist only among the Gentiles.

[Jeremiah 31:35-37 refutes "Reconstructionism" and similar heresies.]

Another strange issue is the prominence of sacrifices in the Millennium. It would seem that they are memorials after the fact, just as the sacrifices in the Old Testament were memorials in advance.

A Time to Study

As recent events have so dramatically emphasized to all of us, it is, indeed, a time to reexamine our perspectives, and to acknowledge in our personal priorities that history includes some shocking "non-linearities": even our most cherished presumptions are subject to cataclysmic challenges!

It is time to refresh our understanding from the bedrock of Scripture and to recognize the urgency of the times.

I believe we are rapidly being plunged into a period of time about which the Bible says more than it does about any other period of time in history - including the time that Jesus walked the shores of Galilee and climbed the mountains of Judea!

Are you ready?

Maranatha!

Dr. Chuck Missler, is an internationally known author, is among the best-known Bible expositors in the world, and was a prominent speaker on the subject of Bible prophecy and is featured on many Christian radio and television stations worldwide. He is well known for his Biblical studies including most notably Learn the Bible in 24 Hours, The Book of Revelation(link is external), The Book of Genesis(link is external), and The Book of Daniel(link is external), as well as his topical studies Return of the Nephilim(link is external) and his Angels(link is external) series.

Chuck and his late wife Nancy Missler founded Koinonia House in 1973. Chuck passed away in May, 2018.

http://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/395/

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

SOLO CHRISTO - sometimes listed as solus Christus - "through Christ alone" - one of five solas proclaimed by Protestant Reformers that emphasized the essential role of Jesus in salvation. Jesus is the One who offers access to God, not a human spiritual leader.



.

Christ Alone
Solo Christo 
- through Christ alone
By Dillon Burroughts 





What Is Solo Christo?
Solo Christo (sometimes listed as solus Christus; "through Christ alone") was one of five solas proclaimed by Protestant Reformers that emphasized the essential role of Jesus in salvation.
The term consists of solo meaning "only" and Christo meaning Christ.
In contrast with the Roman Catholic tradition of salvation based on faith plus a variety of works, a belief that was widespread at the time of the Protestant Reformation, solo Christo taught salvation as something only available through Jesus.
The Roman Catholic tradition had placed church leaders such as priests in the role of an intercessor between church members and God.
Reformers emphasized the role of the "high priest" Jesus who intercedes on our behalf before the Father. 
Hebrews 4:15 teaches, "For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin."
Jesus is the One who offers access to God, not a human spiritual leader. 
In addition, the Protestant Reformers returned to the Biblical concept of Jesus as the only provider of salvation, not the Roman Catholic Church.
As a result, many people felt free to join the Protestant movement since salvation could be found through Christ outside of the Roman Catholic Church. 
Acts 4:12 emphasized Jesus as the sole provider of salvation, teaching, "And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved."
The Protestant Reformation included much variety.
In Germany, Lutheranism became popular due to Martin Luther's leadership in the Reformation.
In Switzerland, John Calvin's influence led to a surge in Reformed Theology that has heavily influenced the Presbyterian Church.
Anabaptists also arose during this time, emphasizing the baptism of believers (in contrast with infant baptism) and a "free church" style that abandoned much of the traditional liturgy of the Catholic Church as well as its centralized leadership under the Pope.
All three of these expressions of Protestantism extended into the British Isles and later into North America.
Regardless of such diversity, the message of "Christ alone" remained central.
As John Calvin wrote in his influential Institutes of the Christian Religion, "We look to Christ alone for divine favor and fatherly love!"
This teaching also encompasses the fifth and final sola of soli Deo gloria or "to the glory of God alone."
Since salvation is from Christ and through Christ alone, we stand compelled to live a life for His glory alone.
As 1 Corinthians 10:31 notes, "So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.
Our lives are created by God and for God.
As author and pastor John Piper writes in God Is the Gospel, "The ultimate aim of the gospel is the display of God's glory and the removal of every obstacle to our seeing it and savoring it as our highest treasure."
Still today, our ultimate goal in following Christ is to give glory to God with every aspect of our lives. 
Open your heart now, settle that sin issue that nothing may hinder your relationship with Him, by saying this prayer:
“Father God, I confess I am a sinner and my sins have separated me from You.
I am truly sorry.  I now want to turn away from my past sinful life and live a new life pleasing to You.
Please forgive me, and help me avoid sinning again.
I believe that your Son, Jesus Christ died for my sins, was resurrected from the dead, is alive, and hears my prayer.
I invite Jesus to become the Lord of my life, to rule and reign in my heart from this day forward.
Please send your Holy Spirit to help me obey You, and to do Your will for the rest of my life. Thank You that according to Your Word I am now born again.
I promise to study Your Word – the Bible.
Please use me for Your glory.
In Jesus' Name I pray, Amen.”

http://www.blogos.org/churchandministry/sola-christo.php




You might also like:

Worship Song Lyrics - In Christ Alone - WattpadIn Christ Alone
written by Stuart Townend and Keith Getty
CLICK HERE . . . to view complete playlist . . . 

 

Sunday, December 17, 2017

FEMALE POPE - The legend of Pope Joan, allegedly the first and only woman elected pope. The story of Pope Joan was not invented in the Reformation, like many Catholic urban legends were. But the Reformation gave it the impetus to leap into modern thought. Let’s have a Catholic urban legend with a twist. This one dates from before the Reformation and its sources are therefore entirely Catholic. It is the legend of Pope Joan, allegedly the first and only woman elected pope. According to the story, she was pope in the ninth century during the so-called “Dark Ages” until her female identity was revealed. As old as the 13th century, and as recent as a 2005 ABC News “special,” Pope Joan will be around as long as she serves an anti-Catholic purpose. She began as an anti-papal fable, persisted as nativist anti-Catholic propaganda, and has blossomed into a 21st-century feminist icon. In many ways, Pope Joan fits the traditional Catholic urban legend. Take any historical period and she can be molded into a solidly anti-Catholic niche. In the 16th century, Protestant dissenters used her to illustrate the nadir of an ever-corrupt papacy. In the 19th century, she was portrayed as a woman violated and ruined by lascivious clericalism, symbolic of the perversity to which Rome had sunk. In the 21st century, she represents the empowered female who fought the intransigent sexism of the Catholic Church and who therefore had to be destroyed.

Image result for images female pope joan
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................

The Female  Pope 
(The Popess Who Just Won’t Go Away)
By:  Robert P. Lockwood     catholicsay.com



Let’s have a Catholic urban legend with a twist. This one dates from before the Reformation and its sources are therefore entirely Catholic. And in a final twist, the first widely accepted refutation came from a Calvinist scholar.

It is the legend of Pope Joan, allegedly the first and only woman elected pope.

According to the story, she was pope in the ninth century during the so-called “Dark Ages” until her female identity was revealed.

As old as the 13th century, and as recent as a 2005 ABC News “special,” Pope Joan will be around as long as she serves an anti-Catholic purpose.

She began as an anti-papal fable, persisted as nativist anti-Catholic propaganda, and has blossomed into a 21st-century feminist icon.

In many ways, Pope Joan fits the traditional Catholic urban legend. Take any historical period and she can be molded into a solidly anti-Catholic niche.

In the 16th century, Protestant dissenters used her to illustrate the nadir of an ever-corrupt papacy.

In the 19th century, she was portrayed as a woman violated and ruined by lascivious clericalism, symbolic of the perversity to which Rome had sunk.

In the 21st century, she represents the empowered female who fought the intransigent sexism of the Catholic Church and who therefore had to be destroyed.

Not-So-Pious Legend

What is the legend of the female pope? Stories abound, but let’s go with the most recent edition, a “special” ABC News television report in December 2005.

Breathlessly narrated by Diane Sawyer, the ABC News rendition begins in the town of Mainz, Germany, in the ninth century, where a bright young girl manages to sneak into a monastery disguised as a boy.

She becomes an adept student and eventually makes her way to Athens, still disguised as a man. But by then she had also taken a lover who shared her secret.

From Athens, the little lady heads to ninth-century Rome, described by Ms. Sawyer as the home of “bawdy monks, scheming cardinals, cross-dressing saints, intrigue, melodrama, corruption and violence.”

Now known as “English John,” the girl becomes a respected curial secretary, then a cardinal, and — drumroll please —” the choice of all for pope in the year 855.”

But there was to be no happy ending: “Pope Joan was in the midst of a papal procession. . . when . . . she felt sharp pains in her stomach . . . The unthinkable happened: The pope was having a baby.”

While acknowledging that the story concludes differently depending on the telling, Sawyer reported that Pope Joan was either stoned or dragged from a horse’s tail to her death.

And then kicking the legend into high gear, Sawyer asserted that embarrassment over Pope Joan resulted in mandated priestly celibacy (“a requirement that’s still controversial today”), a crackdown on powerful female mystics who claimed that they could communicate directly with God and who did not need the male-dominated Church, and a host of “women martyrs . . . who were tortured for their religious beliefs.”

A whole bunch of Catholic urban legends rolled into one there.

The Myth of “English John”

The 21st-century moral of the legend of Pope Joan is clear: The Church fears powerful women, the Church has purposefully redacted out any mention of powerful women from its history, and the persistent tradition of priestly celibacy resulted from the hatred of women.

The fact that priestly celibacy existed in the Western Church centuries before this fable and that powerful women were part of Church history long before secular society would allow such a thing is immaterial to the propaganda.

The amazing thing — or maybe not so amazing — is that no one at ABC News considered that this might be contemporary anti-Catholic woolgathering, rather than any kind of objective presentation.

It’s all just the “normative thinking and part of the cultural baggage of the progressive mind,” to quote myself.

So, what’s the story on Pope Joan?

In a nutshell, as described by a recent historian of the papacy, John-Peter Pham in Heirs of the Fisherman (Oxford University Press), Pope Joan is “a legendary female pope who never existed” (253).

Yet, “from the mid-13th through the mid-17th centuries, the story that there had been a female pope . . . at some date in the ninth, tenth, or eleventh century was almost universally accepted as historical fact” (Pham,Heirs, 253).

According to Pham, the first time “Pope Joan” was mentioned in any known historical record was in the “Universal History of Metz” around 1250.

The work was attributed to Jean de Mailly, a Dominican priest who gave the basic outline of the fable.

He wrote that Pope Victor III (1087), who had only a four-month pontificate, was succeeded by a woman disguised as a man, who died after giving birth during a papal procession.

Another Dominican priest and a Franciscan friar repeated the tale in their own works, but moved the female “papacy” back to 1100, then 915.

It was then included in the “Chronicle of Popes and Emperors” by Martin of Troppau at the end of the 13th century.

Martin gave the story its essential outline, with Joan being elected as “John Anglicus” after the death of Pope Leo IV (847-855).

Riding in procession from St. Peter’s to the Lateran Basilica, she allegedly gave birth on a narrow street between the Coliseum and the Basilica of San Clemente. She died in childbirth and was buried on the spot.

Later generations attached to the story the gory details of an angry mob killing her and the baby.

A Myth Gains, Loses, Steam

The myth of Joan would have been forgotten as the invention it was had it not been picked up in the 14th century by Italian poet Boccaccio, who used it for his own anti-papal propaganda.

Other humanists followed suit, trying to settle an Italian score against the popes for their high-paying sponsors.

Siena Cathedral had a bust of Joan, a sign less of its historicity than of its feud with the Vatican.

Pham points out that the story of Joan was later used by the Bohemian dissenter John Hus (d. 1415) as part of his list of alleged misdeeds of the papacy.

As early as the 15th century, when the first stirrings of what might be called a more disciplined approach to history had begun, the story of Joan was being called into question.

When the fable was used as anti-Catholic fodder during the Reformation, Catholic historians began to question its historicity.

And soon, oddly enough, their perspective was confirmed by a French Calvinist historian.

David Blondel (1590-1655) was a Protestant living in the Netherlands who effectively used the early tools of historical study to dismantle the myth of Pope Joan.

Tracking the history of the popes during that period and the lack of any contemporary mention of Joan in what would have been, if true, an astounding event to be exploited by papal enemies, he dismissed the legend.

His fellow Protestants of the era dismissed Blondel because, as Pierre Bayle said, “the Protestant interest requires the story of Joan to be true.”

Which is why the legend of Pope Joan persisted. It made for good Reformation polemics.

The story of Pope Joan was not invented in the Reformation, like many Catholic urban legends were.

But the Reformation gave it the impetus to leap into modern thought — and eventually show up in an ABC News special in the 21st century.

The Missing Gap

The fundamental flaw in the Pope Joan legend and why any serious historian would reject it is that there is no “gap” in the actual traceable historical record where “Pope Joan” would have served if the legend were true.

The legend places Pope Joan in the papacy from 855 to 857, elected as “John Anglicus.”

But Pope Leo IV, who died in June 855, was immediately succeeded by Pope Benedict III. We know this because Benedict’s election was not without controversy.

The Byzantine Emperor tried to have his son installed as pope in his place. Rome was invaded and Benedict imprisoned.

When the Romans objected to this, Benedict was freed from prison that September. There was simply no historical time gap when an imaginary pope could have served.

Of equal importance to historians is the absence of any record, mention, or reference to a “Pope Joan” until nearly 400 years after her election.

As Blondel realized, it would have been impossible for such an event to have taken place, or for a papacy to have existed for nearly three years without some contemporary record from those years.

And even when some versions push the date forward, a gap of centuries before she is first mentioned remains, and the historical record of the existing popes at those times is irrefutable.

So there was clearly no Pope Joan. Two questions remain: Where did the legend first arise and why are we still dealing with it today?

As to where the legend came from, historians can only guess. Pham states that “the kernel of the story is generally taken to be an ancient Roman folktale” (Heirs 254).

Others see a possible source coming out of allegations that Pope John VIII (872-882) was effeminate, though even that charge seems lacking in substance.

Still others suggest that the story may have come out of the papacy of Pope Sergius (904-911), whom the Romans viewed as weak and dominated by powerful and corrupt women.

Certain historians believe that the legend might have come out of the Eastern Byzantine Empire as a means to discredit the “western” papacy.

Whatever the source, history is rife with legends of women disguised as men rising to great ranks.

Ancient Greece and Rome had them.

But the purpose of such legends was usually satirical: It was meant to show how weak or corrupt the men of the time and place had become.

The moral of the tale was that the men were so spineless that a woman could assume leadership. And that means that the legend of Pope Joan is hardly feminist hagiography.

If anything, it reflects a degrading and persistent animus toward women that lingered from pagan culture.

Why are we still dealing with Pope Joan today when thousands of similar medieval legends have disappeared?

Google Pope Joan and you will find millions of Internet references.

The legend persists for the same reason that all Catholic urban legends persist—they fit in with the contemporary anti-Catholic propaganda.

Joan has survived — despite the earliest forms of historical criticism showing her to be a myth — because she fits an agenda.

As Bayle might say to Blondel were these men around today, “The secular interest requires the story of Joan to be true.”

Image result for images female pope joanImage result for images female pope joanImage result for images female pope joan



You might also like:


What Jesus rejected, 
the popes
accepted 



..
10 Torture devices used by the Catholic Church in the Inquisition





..
The Roman Catholic Popes Evil 
Behavior











popa