............................................................................................................................................
The Meaning of Genesis 3:15
.
The verse truly is fascinating, providing the very first
biblical glimpse of God’s plan of redemption, focusing ultimately upon the
final thrusting of Satan into the eternal hell of fire. Christ’s death for
human sin was, in effect, a wound rendered by Satan - but the Lord’s
resurrection, exaltation, and final victory will destroy the devil’s revolting
efforts.
The prophecy reveals that the glorious cause of the woman’s Seed
would prevail ultimately. Satan and his forces will be crushed.
By Wayne Jackson
Genesis 3:15 is
commonly called the “Protevangelium” — a term that essentially signifies the
idea of “first gospel proclamation.”
In the American
Standard Translation (1901), the text reads as follows:
“and I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between
thy seed and her seed: he shall bruise [crush — NIV] thy head, and
thou shalt bruise [strike — NIV] his heel.”
Professor William
Beck’s, An American Translation (4th edition), renders the
passage:
“And I will put enmity between you and the woman and between
your descendants and her Descendant. He will crush your head, and you will
bruise His heel.”
The verse truly is
fascinating, providing the very first biblical glimpse of God’s plan of
redemption, focusing ultimately upon the final thrusting of Satan into the
eternal hell of fire (Revelation 20:10).
The Background
The passage rises
from an interview in the garden of Eden between God, Adam and Eve, and,
finally, the treacherous serpent.
When confronted
with his transgression, Adam blamed Eve.
Ultimately, he put the responsibility upon God himself stating, “the
woman you gave me...”
Eve similarly rationalized, charging, “the serpent beguiled
me.”
That this “serpent”
was a vehicle of Satan is beyond dispute.
Paul says that the “serpent beguiled Eve,” and, in the
same context, he argues that “Satan fashions himself into a messenger of
light” (2 Corinthians 11:3, 14).
Moreover, John’s
references to Satan as “the old serpent” (Revelation 12:9; 20:2) are obvious
allusions to the Genesis record.
The Spokesman
Moses designates
the speaker as “Jehovah [LORD — KJV] God” (verse 14).
The Hebrew term in
the first instance is Yahweh — a
designation of the self-existing Creator (cf. Exodus 3:14), who will form a
special redemptive, covenant relationship with the nation of Israel.
The second title is
“God” — Elohim.
Though the
etymology of the term is obscure, it likely derives from a root form meaning
“strong.”
The name appears to
be used mainly of God’s right to govern his world and mankind (Clark, 239).
The combined use of
these names lends great force to the utterance that follows.
Components of the Text
Let’s briefly
consider the various participants and components of this intriguing text.
The Serpent
Jehovah’s remarks
in Genesis 3:15 are addressed to the serpent immediately, though to Satan ultimately
(cf. Romans 16:20).
They allege that
Satan is but a “personification of the self-accusing conscience of Israel” (Gray, IV.4298).
However, both
Testaments of the sacred volume treat him as the personal, arch-enemy of
Almighty God. He is the murderer of fallen humanity (John. 8:44; Romans
5:12).
Following his
malicious deed, this curse from Jehovah God previews the devil’s horrible
destiny.
The Woman
The woman of the
context is Eve. But the main focus is not upon her; rather it is upon her seed
(see below).
On the other hand,
while there is mention of the serpent’s seed, the primary thrust is toward the
destruction of the malignant force working through the serpent (i.e. Satan),
rather than upon this enemy’s seed — though certainly they will share his fate (Matthew 25:41).
The Enmity
The term “enmity”
denotes a disposition of hostility, whether between individuals (Numbers
35:21-22), or between bodies of people (Ezekiel 25:15; 35:5).
Between what
parties is there enmity, as suggested in this text?
While some see it
as an abiding antipathy between humans and snakes (Owen, 13), clearly the scope
moves far beyond such a trite explanation.
The language
denotes the initial spirit of antagonism between Eve and her adversary (her
destroyer), together with the suggestion that there would be a spiritual
hostility developing between the woman’s seed, Christ (along with his people),
and Satan and his followers.
This theme is well
illustrated in the parable of the tares (see Matthew 13:24-30; 36-43; cf. 1 John.
3:10).
Jehovah’s Action
The text represents Jehovah as saying, “I will put enmity
....”
How is the origin
of this hostility to be attributed to God, who is an absolutely holy Being (Isaiah 6:3; Revelation
4:8)?
There are two
components. First, there is a standard of truth and righteousness which
proceeds from the very nature of deity.
Second, rational
individuals are creatures of moral responsibility.
When men (or spirit
beings, e.g., angels) exercise their volition, and rebel against the Creator,
enmity is bound to result.
God, then, is the
author of the enmity only in the sense that he makes demands upon responsible
beings — which frequently they choose to ignore (cf. Exodus 7:3ff).
Woman’s Seed
Who is the woman’s
seed? Simply her descendants?
An affirmative
answer to the first question is not plausible.
Clearly, the seed promise of this entire book (Genesis 22:18; cf.
Galatians 3:8, 16) finds its complete fulfillment in the Savior who, in the
fullness of time, was “born of woman” (Galatians 4:4).
Sometimes the claim
is made that Genesis 3:15 is a precise prophecy of the “virgin birth” of
Jesus, since the phrase “seed of woman” appears to be unique.
In the normal
conception process, it is alleged, the male provides the “seed.”
Will this argument
stand the test of candid investigation? Frankly, it will not.
The “seed”
of Hagar is mentioned later in the book (Genesis 16:10), as is also the “seed”
of Rebekah (Genesis 24:60), and yet no virgin births were involved in those cases.
The expression does
not “exclude a virgin birth,” but the grammar alone does not establish
it (Lewis, 11).
E. F. Kevan once
carefully noted:
“It is not right to infer the virgin birth from the
Protevangelion, but it is certainly quite legitimate to look back from the
point of view of the virgin birth and see how marvelously close were the words
of promise to the mode of the performance”.
H. L. Ellison goes so far as to say that: “Not until the
Virgin Birth could the full implication of the promise be understood (cf. Isaiah 7:14)”.
The Conflict
In the common
versions, the term “bruise” is twice found.
Satan bruises the
Seed’s heel; the woman’s Seed bruises the serpent’s head.
Some translators
prefer to render the first instance as “bruise” or “strike at” (NIV), while rendering
the latter term by “crush” (Beck; Stigers, 78).
Some contend that
the Hebrew verb swp (“bruise”)
occurs twice in this verse, but that contextual considerations suggest a varied
rendering.
A man can “crush”
a snake’s head, while the snake can only “bruise,” or wound, the man’s
heel, without the action necessarily being permanent.
The translation
should conform, they suggest, to the nature of the circumstances.
Others allege that
the text actually contains similar, though different, words.
Stigers argues that “crush” and “bruise” represent
"a play on two Hebrew words that look alike, as though from the same
root.”
But bruise is
from suph, whereas crush is from saaph, an allied root (Stigers, 79; see
also Harris, et al., 912; VanGemeren, 67).
Atkinson sums up:
“Whatever the exact meaning of the verb, the picture seems to be
clear. To bruise the head is a picture of fatal and final destruction. To
bruise the heel is a picture of damage, which is neither fatal nor final” .
In the final
analysis, we must say that the complete biblical picture does reveal a
difference in the significance of the terms.
Christ’s death for
human sin was, in effect, a wound rendered by Satan.
But the Lord’s
resurrection, exaltation, and final victory will destroy the devil’s revolting
efforts (Romans 8:20-21; 1 Corinthians 15:26; Colossians 2:15; Hebrews 2:14;
1 John. 3:8; Revelation 20:10).
Great Truths Taught
There are a number
of important points that we would make in concluding this discussion.
These are practical
points from which we may learn and enhance our own spiritual lives.
Consider the
following.
Satan — a real enemy
There is the fact
that Satan is a real enemy, and a formidable opponent.
He is the
ever-tempting one (Matthew 4:3 — a present tense participle) who, as our
adversary, continuously is on the prowl for those whom he may devour (1 Peter 5:8).
Nothing could
please him more than for liberal theologians to dismiss him as a mythological
metaphor.
Elsewhere we have
discussed the history and mission of Satan in greater detail (Jackson, 103-111).
Not a myth or legend
Allegations that
the “serpent story” is a mere legend, are based upon anti-supernatural
presuppositions.
The God who
fashioned all creatures certainly could, for a special occasion, empower a
serpent to speak, just as in the case of Balaam’s donkey (Numbers 22:28).
The inspired Paul
viewed the episode as strictly historical (2 Corinthians 11:3).
There also is
archaeological evidence that connects the serpent image with man’s original
fall.
A seal was
discovered at ancient Nineveh depicting a man and woman on either side of a
fruit tree. To the left of the woman stands a serpent.
Dr. Ira Price of the
University of Chicago suggested that it likely portrayed an early tradition of
the fall of man.
Serpents have been
associated with the destruction of human immortality in several ancient
cultures (Handy, 1114).
Such traditions,
though distorted, may be traced ultimately to the historical events of Eden.
A preview of Christ
Genesis 3:15 is a
preview of the incarnate Christ.
The expression “seed
of woman” implies humanity.
The virgin would
conceive and bear a son (Isaiah 7:14).
[Note: The
reference is not to Isaiah’s son, as some erroneously allege (Owen, 13).]
Indeed, a child
would be born, a son given (Isaiah 9:6).
The apostle John,
of course, notes that the eternal Word “became flesh” and dwelt among
the human family (John. 1:14).
There are
tremendous reasons for the necessity of the Redeemer being human, not the least
of which is the fact that a spirit-being cannot die a physical death (cf. 1 Timothy
6:16).
But Jesus partook of the nature of humanity that “through
death he might bring to naught him that had the power of death, that is, the
devil” (Hebrews 2:14).
The suffering of Christ
The allusion to the
woman’s seed being bruised unquestionably looks to the suffering of Christ on
behalf of the sins of humanity.
In Isaiah 53, there
is a vivid portrait of Jehovah’s abused servant, the Christ (cf. Luke 22:37;
Acts 8:32-35).
Twice the prophet
speaks of the promised Messiah being “bruised” (daka) and wounded as an
offering for sin (Isaiah 53:5, 10).
The death of Jesus,
planned even before the foundation of the world (1 Peter 1:19-20), was previewed in
this miniature “gospel.”
Incidentally, this
symbolic prophecy of the death of Christ is in conflict with certain
dispensational allegations, namely, that the Lord’s death was not a part of
Heaven’s original plan.
S. D. Gordon, in his book Quiet Talks about Jesus,
wrote: “It can be said at once that His dying was not God’s own plan. It was
conceived somewhere else and yielded to by God”.
Absurd!
Resurrection implied
The fact that only
Christ’s “heel” (in contrast to the serpent’s “head”) was to be
injured, obviously alludes to the Lord’s resurrection from the dead.
Jesus’ death would
not terminate the divine mission.
Human alliance with Satan
The allusion to the
serpent’s seed ominously predicts that many of the human family would choose to
be aligned with Satan, rather than with the Son of God.
This stands in bold
relief to the modern notion that all men basically are good, and are,
therefore, perfectly at liberty to pursue the course of their own interests in
life with Heaven’s approval.
Genesis 3:15
contradicts universalism.
Victory over Satan
The prophecy
reveals that the glorious cause of the woman’s Seed would prevail ultimately.
Satan and his forces will be crushed.
As Paul writes, in
words designed to encourage the saints in the imperial city of Rome:
“And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet
shortly” (Romans 16:20).
Observe the
expression, “your feet.”
The redeemed will
partake of Christ’s triumph! (cf. Revelation 19:14).
Though Paul’s
prophecy may refer to a situation more immediate than remote, the term “shortly”
does not necessarily demand chronological proximity.
Rather, “the phrase means ‘swiftly.’ As with a swift stamping
of the feet one crushes a snake’s head...” (Lenski, 922).
As noted earlier,
Satan’s dreaded destiny is graphically set forth in the concluding book of the
Bible (Revelation 20:10; cf. Matthew 25:41).
Conclusion
And so, Genesis
3:15 is a grand depository of rich, prophetic information.
In capsulated
format, it highlights the origin of human rebellion.
But it does not
leave the drama hanging; rather, the glorious triumph of the woman’s seed is
previewed.
The “rest of the
story” is depicted in the book of Revelation!
This Old Testament
text certainly is worthy of the designation “first gospel.”
It is the gospel,
sketched in an abbreviated form, which concept, in fact, has the endorsement of
Scripture itself (cf. Galatians 3:8).
Boyd
Wayne Jackson
was born at Old Hickory, Tennessee on August 29, 1937. His parents were Harry
Boyd Jackson and Rubye Hardeman (Porch) Jackson.
Wayne
attended the College of Evangelists in Tupelo, Mississippi. His first full-time
work began shortly thereafter in Delta, Colorado for two years. From 1961 until
2017, he preached for the East Main Street church of Christ in Stockton,
California.
Wayne
earned an A.A. degree from Stockton College, a B.A. from Sacramento Baptist
College and an M.A. from Alabama Christian School of religion.
Wayne
has written for and edited the Christian Courier since its inception
in 1965. He has written more than thirty books on a variety of biblical topics
including The Bible and Science, Creation, Evolution, and the Age of
the Earth, and The Bible on Trial. He has written commentaries covering
all books of the Bible, including a one-volume commentary on the New Testament.
The Christian
Courier began
as a small Bible study journal mailed to readers each month. It was designed to
present the teaching of Jesus in a simple, lucid style not characterized by
ostentation or inflated language. It is written for average Christians — to
help them become more knowledgeable in God’s Word, to fortify their faith in
the Savior, and to equip them for defending the truth and living righteously in
a sinful world.
No comments:
Post a Comment